Legal - a case study -
Cause No. D-n-GN-0n-00nnnn |
|
Cause No. D-n GN-0n-00-nnnn |
||
|
§ § § § § § § § § § |
|
|
After considering Plaintiff BANK OF GEORGIA's (hereinafter "Plaintiff") Nonsuit Without Prejudice against Defendant, and request to sign an Order of Nonsuit With Prejudice.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiffs claim’s are dismissed with prejudice.
SIGNED on January 1,2000
__(signature)_____________ PRESIDING JUDGE |
NOTES (not part of the pleadings): A very clever way for the Court to get to the results wanted without having to address the defenses pleaded by defendant. On the face of this order, and on Plaintiff's last pleading (which supplants all his prior pleadings) it is essentially what the Plaintiff asked for. In Texas the term "nonsuit" and "dismissed" are used interchangeably. By submitting a "Nonsuit With Prejudice" as his last pleading, the Plaintiff now has no grounds for appeal. I get the "dismissed with prejudice" that I want. The "with prejudice" term prevents Plaintiff from ever bringing the suit again in Texas. |
©2000 Simon Revere Mouer III, PhD, PE, all rights reserved